[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes
From: |
Mike Bianchi |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:44:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:07:51PM +0200, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> ----- Original Nachricht ----
> Von: Mike Bianchi <address@hidden>
>
> > In troff, the number of / characters necessary to output a single
> > / character grows exponentially with macro depth.
>
> Ok, but should we consider fields as macros? I had not expcted up
> to now that fields reduce \\ to \. And we now have a difference
> between groff and other troff variants here.
>
> So I read your and Ralph's mail as "\\ should not be used to produce
> a \ character in the output and so we don't need to fix this feature"?
That is my take. \\ yielding \ output is relying on a side-effect of the
definition of "escape character" .
\e yielding \ relies on the common, but not universal,
case where the escape character is has the current value of / .
\[rs] is utterly reliable within groff.
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
address@hidden
http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
http://www.FovealMounts.com
- [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Blake McBride, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Carsten Kunze, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Ted Harding, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Carsten Kunze, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Mike Bianchi, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes, Carsten Kunze, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Groff] [Groff & Heirloom] tbl problem with backslashes,
Mike Bianchi <=