groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs


From: Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Subject: Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:27:05 +0200
User-agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.7.10-1.16-desktop; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; )

Am Sonntag 28 Juli 2013, 22:24:03 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> 
> > If I code the text with \[u u030A] I expect it to be in the PDF.
> 
> This glyph is only contained in the URW fonts.  For example, try this
> with the PDF backend:
> 
>   .fam U-T
>   uring: \[u u030A]
> 
> 
>     Werner

Thanks Werner
I now use -Tpdf and "Latin small letter u with ring above"
and most others work.
I still have sometimes problems with the special glyphs.
It seems that it depends on the order they are called.
At the moment I'm not able to reproduce it clearly with a small example.
Attached is a part of the generated PDF (as png, it is smaller)
and the generated HTML.

The word is written as groff test "\[vs]\[n ah]\[u016F]ra"

As said it does work mostly, but not always.
And it happens, whether i use \[u u030A] or \[u016F].


best regards
    Heinz

Attachment: pdf.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: html.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]