[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf
From: |
Daode |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:12:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
s-nail s-nail-14.2-1-gade5266 |
Keith Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
|On 13/04/13 14:52, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
|>> Any comments?
|
|Some projects do commit configure, others don't. IMO, it is better if
|it is *not* committed, but IIRC it has been there, in groff's CVS, for
|as long as I've been associated with the project. I would be in favour
|of removing it now...
Please don't change this friendly current situation.
It is really a terrible thing that many projects do no longer
/ not ship a self-contained repository, but one that requires an
immense amount of utilities just to create a runnable configure
script.
I've just set up a completely new box and added perl(1), mksh(1),
vim(1) and some others […] -- and it is so nice *not* to need this
huge toolchain. E.g., GNU gettext alone has a 70 MB (!) checkout
(with the gettext.c of it consuming 10820 bytes).
Even if i had a locale package cache, being able to simply update
a repository on releases / bugfixes and to simply recompile the
package is definitely a quality-of-implementation in my eyes.
|Keith.
Ciao,
--steffen
- [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Bernd Warken, 2013/04/13
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/04/13
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Keith Marshall, 2013/04/13
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf,
Daode <=
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Keith Marshall, 2013/04/13
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/04/13
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/14
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Bernd Warken, 2013/04/14
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/14
- Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/04/14
Re: [Groff] autoconf and autoreconf, Bernd Warken, 2013/04/13