[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff_lilypond v0.2
From: |
Pierre-Jean |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff_lilypond v0.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:16:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
Hello alls,
The groff_lilypond program is a very nice idea. But since
many of you seems to want to write music with troff, why not
asking to lilypond people to implement a groff output, since
it seems to exist a latex output?
I mean, they might not want, or have no time to do this,
but, it's not impossible that someone find interesting to
work on that, isn't it?
I'm asking this question because I don't exactly understand
why nobody seems to wish that: is that wished but for some
reason impossible -- and so not said -- or is that not
wished? In both case, I would appreciate to understand why.
Cheers,
Pierre-Jean.
"Bernd Warken" <address@hidden> wrote:
> In groff_lilypond there are now 2 modes for generating the EPS
> files:
> --ly2eps (the new default) and
> --pdf2eps (that's the old mode from version v0.1 with pdf to ps to eps).
>
> With ly2eps mode, lilypond generates the EPS files itself, for each page
> one EPS file.
>
> Unfortunately the .PSPIC works only in groff pdf and dvi mode, not in ps.
> Tty, X and html mode have errors and display only a rectangle with the
> file name.
>
> To fix that is beyond my knowledge.
>
> I could write the groff_lilypond program only by the knowledge that many
> of you gave per email. I thank you very much.
>
> Bernd Warken