Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> > groff to XML to HTML via doclifter produces better HTML than any of
>> > the direct groff -> HTML tools.
>> 
>> Sadly, this is true.  grohtml would need a big hug with much love to
>> grow up, but currently nobody really takes care of it.
> 
> The problem is fundamental - a good conversion needs structural
> analysis as good as doclifter's, which is *hard*.

Yes.  However, grohtml would be able to do different things, in a
different way, and with proper markup the results could be excellent
also.  Sigh.


    Werner