groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Google+


From: Ted Harding
Subject: Re: [Groff] Google+
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:51:40 +0100 (BST)

On 18-Apr-2012 20:01:40 James K. Lowden wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400
> Peter Schaffter <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which
>> might not be the case with Google+.
> 
> Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0?  Not that I'm helping....
> 
> --jkl

Let me help ...
IxHUBnrPmuSCFrrURlPkpvhRDghbPCfJuuVQtRKnetWeqfdffE
NXTVxkVTWuKaymQHgvSxGwgRAQVLtXVGlOMwZXFGqzgJvcCWto
xNvaXrvnsPmKzWOHXTpwXWYwYZMcfkuECpkCPggGrYAWAUUfad
UePSGaWtnXseTygfUOiHgwYpWAeROlkrorQmEekABhzNANAzat

Ted.

-------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <address@hidden>
Date: 18-Apr-2012  Time: 21:51:36
This message was sent by XFMail
-------------------------------------------------


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]