[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:54:50 +0100 |
Hi Anton,
> But this would require the somewhat non-standard way of using troff in
> two passes.
Is it non-standard? I thought the normal way was to set up two passes,
or more strictly a loop until everything settles down into place, as
this is how TeX does it too IIRC. Not that TeX's way of doing anything
necessarily makes it right. ;-)
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Groff] gropdf finally added to groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/26
- Re: [Groff] gropdf finally added to groff, Deri James, 2011/07/28
- [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Deri James, 2011/07/28
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/07/28
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Deri James, 2011/07/28
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Pierre-Jean, 2011/07/28
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Anton, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Anton Shepelev, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Keith Marshall, 2011/07/30
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Mike Bianchi, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Mike Bianchi, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Peter Schaffter, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Pierre-Jean, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Anton Shepelev, 2011/07/29
- Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff, Clarke Echols, 2011/07/29