Re: [Groff] tbl and large font

[Denis M. Wilson]

> > Is there any reason why changing the font should not
> > change the baseline also ?
> 
> Yes.  Simple example: assume you want to set just a few words in
> a smaller size, but this short sequence of words happens to wrap
> at the end of the line.  With which baseline spacing should
> the line be set?  That of the larger font used in the rest of
> the paragraph, or that of the smaller font which happens to be
> "active" at the linebreak?
> 
> Since this decision obviously depends on the context, it is
> better to keep the baseline spacing as an independent parameter,
> and leave the choice of both point size and baseline spacing
> up to the typographer.  Like Clarke says, headers may require
> different leading than footnotes to look "good".
> 
> Nevertheless, you can still write your own convenience macro
> to handle font size changes:
> 
>   .de size
>   .ps \\$1
>   .vs \\$1+2
>   ..
> 
> which works quite well in most circumstances (one exception
> is obviously the scenario described above).  But still,
> the choice of what's appropriate depends on you.

Or better:
    .de size
    .ps \\$1
    .vs (u;\\n[.ps]*12/10)
    ..
on the basis that leading is proportional to pointsize.
This 1.2 factor is font-dependent, for example I use
1.425 with Palatino.

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments