[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] antiquity of troff
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] antiquity of troff |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:19:43 +0100 |
Larry Kollar wrote:
> Meg McRoberts wrote:
> > Does anyone know the history of mmx? When I started, mmx was the
> > command we used to produce formatted ASCII text from source that
> > used the *roff macros. I got the idea that it was an older tool
> > which was being linked to nroff at about that time...
>
> I seem to remember reading about it, or something similar, in some
> older documentation. If I'm right, it serves much the same purpose as
> groff does (in relation to gtroff, grops, and so forth): it uses
> command-line options and certain defaults (including calling -mm) to
> build a pipeline.
There used to be mm(1), yes, section 1, on an old AT&T system I used to
use. Part of the Documenter's Work Bench. And that was just a wrapper
that used -mm, etc., as you say.
Cheers,
Ralph.