[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:48:26 +0200 (CEST) |
> I am pretty stunned. It's not clear to me why current software has
> such crude limitations with one must circumvent with even more crude
> wordarounds.
TeX is even worse...
> What about enhancing groff and trowing out these limitations? At
> least in non-compatible mode there should be no problem, in
> compatible-mode the limitations could stay for people who rely on
> this limitations.
Do you volunteer? You might have a look at heirloom troff's
implementation which already has such an extension; it makes
absolutely no sense to program something differently.
http://heirloom.sourceforge.net
Werner
- [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Miklos Somogyi, 2009/10/14
- RE: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Ted Harding, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Patrik Schindler, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Patrik Schindler, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Patrik Schindler, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Ted Harding, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Miklos Somogyi, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Miklos Somogyi, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/17
- Re: [Groff] Integer arithmetic, walter harms, 2009/10/17