[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:36:23 +0100 (CET) |
> Michael Hudson kindly arranged for
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/groff/main to be
> regenerated from scratch, and it's now absent the annoying filler
> changesets. (People with existing checkouts will need to grab fresh
> copies.)
Hmm. Sorry to say, but this doesn't look very good IMHO. Why are
there so many revisions without a summary? This is really bad and
almost completely useless. Compare this to, say, parsecvs, which does
a wonderful job in interpreting CVS-style commit messages while
converting to git.
I won't use this repository in its current form. Any chance to do it
better? Or is this an artifact from the `loggerhead' interface (which
I doubt)?
Werner
- [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/15
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Robert Thorsby, 2009/02/15
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/19
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/02/27
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Joerg van den Hoff, 2009/02/16
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Zvezdan Petkovic, 2009/02/16
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Colin Watson, 2009/02/16
Re: [Groff] GNU Bazaar import of Groff, Ralph Corderoy, 2009/02/17