groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] gkurz, a short introduction for german users


From: Michael(tm) Smith
Subject: Re: [Groff] gkurz, a short introduction for german users
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:32:40 +0900
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16r5196+badasss (2007-08-16 09:32:33+09:00)

Bruno Haible <address@hidden>, 2007-08-27 00:08 +0200:

> - At many places you put a hyphen ('-', yields '‐') where a hyphen-minus
>   sign ('\-', yields '-') would be more appropriate. Especially in
>   command-line options. The hyphens not only look strange in command-line
>   options, they also don't work:

Forgive me for poking my nose in here, but I wanted to ask about
that particular problem in order to make sure I have the DocBook
manpages stylesheet doing what it should.

So, to be clear, is the following description correct?

If you put a U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS character into the source for a
groff file, in certain environments (e.g., in a UTF-8
environment), it will get output as a U+2010 HYPHEN character.

And, by the way, if the above is correct, is there a documented
rationale for why groff outputs a U+2010 for it instead of a
U+002D? (Some Unicode recommendation?)

  --Mike

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]