[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:56:50 +0100 (CET) |
> but for the next dummy: maybe you could at least capture the
> `xpmtoppm' not found error and emit a hint that one should install
> the `netpbm' package (as I did now)?
But this is already explicitly stated in the top-level README file!
> and while I'm at it: the MathML only concerns me as a potential
> means of transporting equations to some publisher. so I tried the
> `eqn -TMathML' option on some equation and got some strange one-line
> output, probably MathML markup. supposedly some browsers should be
> able to display such stuff (the gecko family at least) but none
> reckognizes the file as such. question: what is the correct way to
> procede: do I need doclifter to transfer this further? how can I
> test the integrity/quality of the MathML output? are there free
> editors (apart from installing some hundred Meg OpenOffice first)?
Hopefully, Eric can answer this. Maybe it's necessary to add some
more info to the groff docs...
Werner
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/03/19