[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot
From: |
Joerg van den Hoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:22:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:21PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > 1.)
> > contrary to earlier versions, this one did initially _not_ compile
> > due to a probably simple problem: utilities such as `xpmtoppm' which
> > are used during documentation generation are not present under OSX
> > und not even available via the package systems (fink, port).
>
> xpmtoppm is part of the netpbm bundle. It's only needed if you build
> from CVS.
a yes, larry already said so. and there it is in the package system.
>
> > question: could the makefile be modified so that it checks for
> > availability of the conversion tools and maybe even tries whether it
> > can use `convert' instead?
>
> This is not necessary: Joe User doesn't compile from the CVS.
by and large I'm joe user myself: I'm simply after the recent MathML facility,
otherwise I would contently wait for the next official release :-). but for the
next dummy: maybe you could at least capture the `xpmtoppm' not found error and
emit a hint that one should install the `netpbm' package (as I did now)?
and while I'm at it: the MathML only concerns me as a potential means of
transporting equations to some publisher. so I tried the `eqn -TMathML' option
on some equation and got some strange one-line output, probably MathML markup.
supposedly some browsers should be able to display such stuff (the gecko family
at least) but none reckognizes the file as such. question: what is the correct
way to procede: do I need doclifter to transfer this further? how can I test
the integrity/quality of the MathML output? are there free editors (apart from
installing some hundred Meg OpenOffice first)?
if 'RTFMs' is the appropriate answer: don't hesitate. I'll do it, then (but
please tell me, which) ...
>
> > after solving(?) point 1 above compile went through. the first test
> > of the installed snapshot now yields more problems:
> >
> > I get _lots_ of errors: " `\E' is not allowed in an escape name"
>
> Uh, oh, this was me yesterday. Will check it soon.
>
thanks haven. I thought OSX was going to be ranked as "unsupported weenie
platform" ;-)
joerg
Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/03/19
- Re: [Groff] problem with current snapshot, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/03/19