[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do a
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:40:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> This is even better because we can avoid conflicts with the .URL
> macro. So let's add .UR and .UE, ignoring the .MTO macro -- the
> latter can be realized as
>
> .UR mailto:address@hidden
> Foo Bar
> .UE
As a design direction, I'm good with this. But I think I need to track
down where this was defined and who was using it.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Zvezdan Petkovic, 2007/01/11
Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/12