groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do a


From: Gunnar Ritter
Subject: Re: [Groff] Progress report on the portability audit -- and what to do about URLs?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:02:18 +0100
User-agent: Heirloom mailx 12.3pre 01/08/07

"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Gunnar Ritter <address@hidden>:
> > > I believe you are incorrect.  If these definitions are *in the file*,
> > > won't the Solarix/AIX/HP-UX toolchain evaluate them the same way
> > > they would evaluate any other local macro?
> > 
> > No, I was quoting ".URL and .MTO" which you cut away, and
> > for rather obvious reason they will not.
>
> Um...are we misunderstanding each other?  
>
> I have not removed any instances of .URL or .MTO.

.URL and .MTO are not two-character names.

        Gunnar




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]