[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future
From: |
Gunnar Ritter |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:50:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.3pre 01/08/07 |
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> wrote:
> You skipped a step. You have a good point about calling up manual
> pages within an editor, but not all character-cell displays are
> equivalent; it doesn't follow from this that man(1) through xterm has
> any value that lynx(1) through xterm wouldn't. I'll be interested to
> see if you can make that argument, especially since Gunnar ducked it.
>
> Until somebody meets that challenge, I'll stick with my diagnosis of
> arrested development.
There is no challenge. This is a talk about preferences,
and I ultimately do not care if you do not like mine.
> It's not one I make casually -- I've been thinking
> *hard* about Unix UI, from a position deep within Unix culture, for
> half a decade now.
I also do not care about swaggering.
When you started this discussion, I was under the
impression that you wanted to do development - to
correct certain problems you found with some manual
pages. I have supported that. But now I find that
it was rather a preparation for this evangelism,
and it makes me turn away in disgust.
Besides that your idea of letting man pop up a
browser window still makes me laugh, especially if
it is accompanied by statements about Unix culture.
Gunnar
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Jon Snader, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Michael Parson, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Jon Snader, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Jon Snader, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future,
Gunnar Ritter <=
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Larry Kollar, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Larry Kollar, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/08
Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/08
Re: [Groff] Status of the portability work, and plans for the future, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/08