[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:34:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
On Friday 05 January 2007 15:25, Clarke Echols wrote:
> > > grohtml outputs elements/tags as lowercase, not uppercase as
> > > required by the HTML recommendations.
> >
> > This is a contradiction. A `recommendation' can never be `required'.
> >
> > I'll stick with requirement. Otherwise, what's the point of a
> > standard?
>
> How about "...as specified by the HTML recommendations."? That should
> solve the problem.
But xhtml-1.0+ *requires* that tags be represented in *lower* case *only*, and
any mixed or upper case representation is (strictly) invalid. AIUI, today's
web authors really should be striving towards xhtml standards compliance; in
this respect, grohtml's use of lower case is already well on the way.
Just my two pennyworth.
Regards,
Keith.
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, (continued)
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, D. E. Evans, 2007/01/04
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, D. E. Evans, 2007/01/04
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, D. E. Evans, 2007/01/05
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, D. E. Evans, 2007/01/05
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, D. E. Evans, 2007/01/05