[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] The case against the case against .EX/.EE & .DS/.DE
From: |
Michael(tm) Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] The case against the case against .EX/.EE & .DS/.DE |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:14:24 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden>, 2006-12-28 18:07 -0500:
> In translating to DocBook, these indented displays would be
> rendered with various nestings of <blockquote> and <literallayout>
> tags. I don't presently do this, because I don't presently notice
> whether .DS has an indent argument or not -- but if .DS with optional
> indent were in man I could support that in about ten minutes flat.
I think doing that would be an abuse of <blockquote>. I hope
doclifter isn't currently using <blockquote> that way in other
places. It's not supposed to be a means to indent things. A
particular processing application may or or may not render it with
an indent. It would be a mistake to assume that every processing
application will indent <blockquote> output.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://www.w3.org/People/Smith/