[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man
|
From: |
Gunnar Ritter |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:41:10 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.2pre 12/28/06 |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Statements like yours are usually coming from ideological followers
> > of the GNU project, not from GNU developers. I am under the
> > impression that all you want is to defend your macros just because
> > they are yours, and resort to non-technical bullshit since you are
> > lacking technical arguments.
>
> The same to you Gunnar: Please soften your tone.
Sorry. I am one of those developers who enjoy a heated
discussion on a technical subject. But this is your list,
of course; I will be more cautious.
Gunnar
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01
- [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/02
Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01