groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation


From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:45:53 +0100 (CET)

> Safe escapes:  
>      \' \- \$ \* \& \<SP> \<CR> 
>      \c \d \e \f \u \n
> 
> Note that \w is *not* safe.

Hmm.

> In general, we can't count on the viewer to be able to render
> horizontal or vertical motions with precision, we can't count on it
> to know font sizes, and we can't even count on it to know whether
> its output uses fixed- or variable-width fonts.

Similar to evaluation, I would like to have some guide lines how to
use \w -- there are examples where this escape greatly improves the
layout in a generic way.  Ideally, those are encapsulated in proper
man macros, but...

> On a related topic, there are a couple of man macro extensions that would go 
> a long way towards eliminating the need for people to do ugly troff
> hackery.  [...]

I agree.

> .EX/.EE: Example displays:
> .DS/.DE: Displays for running text

Those are fine.


    Werner




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]