[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:14:55 +0100 (CET) |
> I could also have it emit a FIXME warning that hand polishing might
> be needed here. I try to avoid those without a really good reason,
> though. Presently I think there's only one, attached to a truly
> wacky edge case in processing of list markup.
Is it possible to have a `verbose' mode of doclifter which suggests
improvements to the man page, or rather, which tells the user that
handling of some snippets is probably flawed?
Werner
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/25
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/25
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Larry Kollar, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/27