[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] PS printing
From: |
Michail Vidiassov |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] PS printing |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2006 07:58:04 +0300 (MSK) |
Dear All,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
... I would like to say that, whatever
additional fonts become available with groff, the standard Adobe
fonts should remain the default.
You are probably misunderstanding. We are talking about updating the
currently used Adobe metrics with better ones -- from Adobe!
And the real question behind the poll is what version of the Adobe metrics
to use - PostScript 2 or PostScript 3.
If a considerable part of the grops output is handled by hardware,
then we have to be conservative and use PS 2 fonts.
On the other hand, PS 3 version has more glyphs and is likely to
be supported by PS/PDF software (ghostscript, Acrobat Reader, host fonts)
and some modern hardware.
Sincerely, Michail
- [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/10
- [Groff] Re: PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/10
- RE: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Ted Harding, 2006/03/10
- Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/10
- Re: [Groff] PS printing,
Michail Vidiassov <=
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Clarke Echols, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Miklos Somogyi, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Deri James, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', m hobgood, 2006/03/10