groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Groff] Re: unicode support, part 13: \-


From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 13: \-
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:05:28 +0100 (CET)

> > > -//{ "\\-", "2212" },
> > > +  { "\\-", "2212" },
> >
> > This change doesn't make sense.  It's not possible to use a
> > backslash within \[...].  Consequently, glyph names which start
> > with a backslash can't be used as composites.
>
> The patch part 14 uses the glyph_name_to_unicode() function at a
> different place, namely for any glyphs, not only composed
> ones. Patch part 13 was meant as a preparation for part 14.

Ah, ok.  I missed that.  Patch applied.


    Werner




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]