groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [Groff] Re: begin page blues


From: Larry Kollar
Subject: Fwd: [Groff] Re: begin page blues
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:17:02 -0500

(Sorry Peter, I meant to send that to the group...)

When I was a youngster (yes!), device independence
and pre- and post-processors were good ideas and necessary.  I
wonder whether it still is the case.

For me: definitely yes.

I concur.

Yes. You have PS/PDF and plain text (usually for man pages),
but there's also a need for HTML (which grohtml handles). Groff
gives the best of both worlds -- the flexibility of adding whatever
front-ends and back-ends are needed, but mostly hiding it all
behind the "groff" command.

This sounds very much like the idea that was fielded a while ago,
namely a WYSIWYG-style front-end that generated groff-formatted
source documents.  ....
I suspect groff would benefit from something like
this--a sort of LyX for groff. ...

However, I noticed that the idea died.  Not sure if it was for lack
of interest, or lack of skills and time in the development
community.

A combination, perhaps. I've played around with LyX, and I
believe it is possible to write an exporter that would produce
some flavor of groff -- the problem there is, what flavor do you
pick? Do you aim for a vanilla macro set, add extensions, or
strike off on your own? Once you make a choice that equally
dissatisfies everyone, actually writing the exporter should be
trivial by comparison. :-)

No chance.  Youngster don't use groff at all.  It's way too uncool,
isn't it? :-)

Actually, I'm finding the opposite.  I've been asked to give a talk
about groff and the mom macro set to the Ottawa/Canada Linux Users
Group, which is composed mostly of "youngsters".  Conversely, I've
noticed that it's people in their forties and fifties, accustomed to
word processing, who think the whole text processing philosophy and
implementation isn't sufficiently cool for their tastes.

Hm. I'm 47, but I've spent the last 20-odd (and I do mean odd)
years doing technical writing. I'm actually getting fed up with
FrameMaker's limitations (and it's pretty much the best of the
WYSIWYG lot) & have started porting one manual I'm working
on to groff. If the translators don't have a coronary when they
see the source files, I'll do more.

--
Larry Kollar     k  o  l  l  a  r  @  a  l  l  t  e  l  .  n  e  t
Unix Text Processing: "UTP Revival"
http://home.alltel.net/kollar/utp/






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]