Re: [Groff] Bullets in manual pages and -K groff option

[walter harms]

if libicons works while iconv() produces wrong results would it be the 
better way to use libiconv in general ? (until iconv() problems are fixed ?)

just my 2 cents,
 walter


Bruno Haible wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > The answer "patch
> > glibc so that iconv transliterates the bullet to 'o'" is better (and in
> > fact this is doable), but I think that users of non-Glibc systems (or
> > old Glibc) will complain if this becomes the official answer.
>
> Why should they complain? They can use GNU libiconv. It transliterates the
> bullet to 'o', like you wish.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Groff mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff