groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] preconv autoconfigury


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [Groff] preconv autoconfigury
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:10:16 +0100

Keith Marshall writes:
> It just seems strange that an autoconf managed project,
> which does not use automake, should rely on a tool which is distributed
> only with automake.

Yes, the automake and autoconf maintainers agree that the 'aclocal' program
would better fit into the autoconf package, rather than in the automake package.
The current packaging is a consequence of history.

If you mind using 'aclocal', you can of course also use a command

    cat $(M4MACROS) > aclocal.m4

instead of

    aclocal -I m4

Bruno


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]