[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Introduction
From: |
Greg 'groggy' Lehey |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Introduction |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 15:54:22 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
What a lot of traffic there has been on this list lately! I've read
all the messages in this thread that I have received, and this seems
to be the best one to hang my reply on; but I've taken other thoughts
into account.
On Saturday, 22 October 2005 at 14:36:36 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> This is true but very unfortunate IMHO. It isn't very difficult
>>> to write a texinfo file, and there are many benefits to do that.
>>
>> However, I have always regretted, even resented, GNU's transition
>> from "man" to "info" for basic reference.
Agreed. I've been using info now for nearly 15 years, and I still
find it clumsy and difficult to navigate.
> I *fully* agree. It seems that you've got the wrong impression that I
> don't like man pages, or that I favour texinfo over man.
I'm glad to hear that. I do agree that groff documentation should be
written in groff.
>> For instance, though are still far from succeeding, I suspect that
>> the GNU Thought Police really want everyone to use EMACS.
>
> I don't think so.
IIRC Ted was suggesting here that info is easier for Emacs users. I'm
a convinced (but not evangelical) user of Emacs, and I don't find that
this is the case. OK, a couple of minor things, like key bindings,
are more intuitive for Emacs users, but that doesn't make it easy to
use.
>> I rarely want to get into the labyrinth of a texinfo document
>> (though I'm pleased it's there I need the more discursive
>> information it contains).
>
> If a texinfo document appears as a labyrinth, it is badly written,
> or rather, it has a bad structure.
This is a reasonable, even definitive, statement. But I have the
feeling that texinfo encourages such bad structure. At any rate,
there are a surprising number of texinfo documents that I find
completely useless, although they seem to contain the information I'm
looking for. You shouldn't need grep(1) to read documentation.
Greg
--
Finger address@hidden for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Ted Harding, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Ted Harding, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Zvezdan Petkovic, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/23
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Larry Kollar, 2005/10/23
- Re: [Groff] Introduction,
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <=
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/23
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Joerg van den Hoff, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Larry Kollar, 2005/10/22
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/23
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Miklos Somogyi, 2005/10/21
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/21
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Larry Kollar, 2005/10/19
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Meg McRoberts, 2005/10/20
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Larry Kollar, 2005/10/20
- Re: [Groff] Introduction, Dorai Sitaram, 2005/10/20