Re: [Groff] grops and Unicode, Unicode in general.

[Michail Vidiassov]

Dear Wartan (and All),
the previuos exchange went as follows:
I wrote:
> 2) To choose some rich font set (MS Times New Roman/Arial/Courier New ?)
> >     and have dit files for them installed by default.
Wartan wrote:
> .. but not for these fonts. They have a license that prevents
>  redistribution, ...
> I would vote for URW with Cyrillic glyphs by frob, since at least their 
> license
> is clear and they seem to be the only decent quality freely available
> Cyrillic-added type1s out there.
But he also wrote:
> Currently, I have to build my own Debian/OS X packages that include
> special fonts

As to the font set _to be distributed with groff_
- there are reasons to be concerned with license.
But when the packages for modern OS's are built (like OS X, Windows, 
Linux(?)) -
it seems strange to ignore bundled fonts.

                 Sincerely, Michail