[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff as a backend
|
From: |
Meg McRoberts |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff as a backend |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:32:23 -0800 (PST) |
> I don't know many WYSYWYG editors but to me it is impossible to resume
> working on a file that has been touched by, for instance, FrontPage.
I don't have a lot of experience with WYSYWYG editors myself but it
seems like DreamWeaver produces reasonably good HTML that could be
edited manually. And XMetal and other XML editors purport to do good
XML. I believe the XMetal WYSYWYG is only an emulator -- the XML is
actually formatted by the style sheet and XMetal emulates that format,
but it may not always be 100% accurate for how the document will ultimately
be formatted.
I suppose it depends whether the people who wrote the WYSYWYG software
had a goal to preserve the text document in a form that can be edited.
meg
- [Groff] groff as a backend, Otavio Exel, 2004/12/14
- Re: [Groff] groff as a backend, joerg van den hoff, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Groff] groff as a backend, Ted Harding, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Groff] groff as a backend, Meg McRoberts, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Groff] groff as a backend, Clarke Echols, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Groff] groff as a backend, Ted Harding, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Groff] vi/vim and sed/awk bigotry :-), Clarke Echols, 2004/12/17
- Re: [Groff] vi/vim and sed/awk bigotry :-), Peter Schaffter, 2004/12/17
- Re: [Groff] vi/vim and sed/awk bigotry :-), Tadziu Hoffmann, 2004/12/17
- Re: [Groff] vi/vim and sed/awk bigotry :-), Tadziu Hoffmann, 2004/12/17