groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] status of pdfmark macros


From: Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Subject: Re: [Groff] status of pdfmark macros
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:42:26 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.7

Am Montag, 6. Dezember 2004 11:55 schrieb Keith MARSHALL:
> Hi Heinz,
>
> > Searching the list for the pdfmark macros wasn't successful.
> > Can someone please help with a link or the files ?
>
> My original tarball can be found, as an attachment, here ...
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2004-09/msg00103.html
>
> I posted a couple of patches, subsequently ...
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2004-09/msg00111.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2004-09/msg00113.html
>
> The first of these implements an optimisation suggested by
> Werner; the second addresses a bug reported by Robert Goulding
> (Robert, you didn't confirm if this patch was successful--have
> you had a chance to test it)?
>
> In the meantime, I have made some fairly extensive changes,
> mostly to address the issue of "pdfhref" links with a "hot-spot"
> spanning page breaks, which now appear to work reliably, in all
> but one case--if a link appears in a footnote diversion, which
> gets output within a page transition which is also spanned by
> another link, then all bets are off!
>
> Actually, links don't work very well in diversions in any case,
> and are best avoided with the current implementation.  I have
> also made some changes to address this issue, but have not yet
> fully tested this aspect.
>
> Since you have expressed a continuing interest, now would seem
> a good time to issue a further patch, so that you can evaluate
> from the same basis as myself.  As before, the attached
>
>    pdfmark.tmac.diff-20041206.gz
>
> is relative to the original tarball, while
>
>    pdfmark.tmak.patch-20041206.gz
>
> applies to a pdfmark.tmac with all of the earlier patches
> already applied.
>
> If you are starting from scratch, don't bother with the two
> interim patches--just download the original tarball and apply
> this latest pdfmark.tmac.diff-20041206.gz
>
>
>
> Anyone who has kept up with the earlier patches, should instead
> apply this new pdfmark.tmac.patch-20041206.gz
>
>
>
> Either approach will bring you up to date with the current
> development state of the pdfmark macros.  I have also added some
> additional content in the documentation file "pdfmark.pdf",
> (which you create from "pdfmark.ms", by invoking either
>
>    ./pdfmake pdfmark
>
> or
>
>    make -f pdfmake pdfmark
>
> in the "contrib/pdfmark" directory.  However, there is still a
> way to go, before even this preliminary documentation could be
> considered complete, and I would also like to provide it in
> texinfo format, with one or two summary manpages.
>
> HTH,
> Keith.


Thanks Keith,
But I'm running into problems applying the patch.
Would it be not better to attach the new tar archive, your latest file 
versions included?

Regards
 Heinz




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]