Re: [Groff] diffmk for groff needs a new name

[M Bianchi]

> So the question to the group is, what should a diffmk for the groff package
> be called?  Considered so-far:
>       gdiffmk         implies GNU, but does not point to roff

A couple more possibilities:
        tdiffmk         implies troff
        rdiffmk         implies roff

So far, the voting (3) favors  gdiffmk ;  diffmark  is second with 2.
        
-- 
 Mike Bianchi
 Foveal Systems

 973 822-2085   call to arrange Fax

 address@hidden
 http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
 http://www.FovealMounts.com