groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Groff] Re: some details missing from your patch


From: Gaius Mulley
Subject: [Groff] Re: some details missing from your patch
Date: 20 Nov 2004 11:48:06 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

> Just to be the devil's advocate: Do we need `.tag' at all (as it is
> currently implemented)?  Isn't `.taga' completely sufficient?
> According to your description, I would say yes.  Or am I missing
> something?

I also think the answer is yes, but I'd like to run the regression
tests and others just to give a confident answer.

Gaius




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]