Re: [Groff] MSVC port still maintained?

[Robert Goulding]

On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Alejandro López-Valencia 
wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:58 PM [GMT-5],
> James McCann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > It looks like MinGW has been worked on more recently, I may use that
> > instead but since the other developers already have MSVC my preference
> > is for MSVC.
>
> Hmmm... You got me wondering... I hadn't updated my working copy of 
> groff in
> a long while. I just tried to compile an up-to-date CVS snapshot and it
> failed miserably with Cygwin (1.5.5-1), both with the POSIX and with 
> the
> MinGW compilers on the same spot (gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (cygming special)):
That's odd - I've compiled the CVS snapshot quite recently (last couple 
of weeks, anyway) under the latest cygwin, and it compiled 
out-of-the-box without a single error.

Robert.