[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:59 +0000 |
Hi Ted,
> You could use the "-d" option to pass non-standard default values to
> groff, since tmac.s checks whether PO, LL, etc. have been defined
> before setting them to the defaults: if they are already defined they
> are not touched. However, setting such details in the command line is
> usually very inconvenient, and it is preferable to plant the necessary
> commands in your input file (as you have done).
I guess another option is to use troff's .mso request instead of -ms on
the command line? Then LL, etc. can be defined before the .mso.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/05
- RE: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ted Harding, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Larry Kollar, 2003/02/27