[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Re: checkmac??
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Re: checkmac?? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:22:14 +0100 |
Hi Meg,
> > > What about porting checkmac or something similar to check the
> > > troff coding in the doc source? It doesn't seem to be part of the
> > > groff distribution.
> >
> > What's checkmac?
>
> Whoops, I should have said checkmm -- I think that was the more
> general name. It's a tool that is included with the UNIX *roff tools
> -- flags things like missing .LE's, unmatched quotes, and so forth in
> the doc source.
DWB 3.0 extended checkmm and renamed it to checkdoc.
> I don't know if there is an equivalent checkms tool -- I've never
> heard of one, but I've also never worked with ms macros before.
I think there have only ever been checkers for -mm. With more modern
groff facilities, I'd assume many of the checkmm checks could be done by
the macro package itself, e.g. macros called in the wrong order.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- Re: [Groff] Bug in html backend, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Bug in html backend, Colin Watson, 2002/08/16
- Re: [Groff] Bug in html backend, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/08/17
- [Groff] checkmac??, Meg McRoberts, 2002/08/17
- [Groff] Re: checkmac??, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/08/18
- [Groff] Re: checkmac??, Meg McRoberts, 2002/08/18
- Re: [Groff] Re: checkmac??,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] Re: checkmac??, Meg McRoberts, 2002/08/18