[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Edit comments for ch06.t
From: |
Jon Snader |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Edit comments for ch06.t |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:59:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.25i |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 08:09:48AM -0400, Jon Snader wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:36:32PM -0400, Larry Kollar wrote:
> >
> > Meg McRoberts wrote:
> >
> >
> > > - Page 16, a boxed example has "I" outside the splined
> > > box. But in general, these boxes are looking much better!
> >
> > Yeah, I noticed that too (the escaping text & the improvement).
> > Jon, any ideas?
> >
>
> I noticed that too but didn't chase it down. I'll take another look
> and figure out what's happening.
The problem here is that the input text looks like
.SS
I would be [blah]
.QP
More [blah]
.SE
When the SE processing takes place the indent is still incremented by
\n[PD], so the box is shifted right (you can see that the left side
is indented). I added a .RT just before the .SE and the problem
disappeared. Should I add a .RT (or .LP 0) to .SE? I'm a little
afraid that that might mess up someone's hand tuned formatting. What
does everyone think?
Jon Snader