groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] changed .substring


From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] changed .substring
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:05:04 +0200 (CEST)

> > I don't have an opinion here.  For me, both Bernd's suggestion
> > (resembling Python) and the current implementation (resembling
> > Elisp) make sense.
>
> Maybe we should require .substring to have 3 arguments.  This would
> not have an impact on functionality, but would remove unclear
> usages.

I can live with two arguments -- actually, most groff requests use
some kind of default if a parameter is missing.


    Werner

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]