[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] changed .substring
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] changed .substring |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:05:04 +0200 (CEST) |
> > I don't have an opinion here. For me, both Bernd's suggestion
> > (resembling Python) and the current implementation (resembling
> > Elisp) make sense.
>
> Maybe we should require .substring to have 3 arguments. This would
> not have an impact on functionality, but would remove unclear
> usages.
I can live with two arguments -- actually, most groff requests use
some kind of default if a parameter is missing.
Werner