[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] \F request?
From: |
Jon Snader |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] \F request? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:11:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.25i |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:36:18PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't \f[] and \F[] (an empty name) the better way to go.
>
> An excellent idea! I like this very much. What do others think? We
> could deprecate \fP in favor of the new syntax; in contrast, \FP would
> only support the new syntax, i.e., accessing family P.
>
Sounds good to me. Old [gt]roff still works and we get the new
functionality.
Jon Snader
[Groff] \f[] implemented, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/04/14