groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] \F request?


From: Jon Snader
Subject: Re: [Groff] \F request?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:11:45 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:36:18PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't \f[] and \F[] (an empty name) the better way to go.
> 
> An excellent idea!  I like this very much.  What do others think?  We
> could deprecate \fP in favor of the new syntax; in contrast, \FP would
> only support the new syntax, i.e., accessing family P.
> 

Sounds good to me.  Old [gt]roff still works and we get the new
functionality.

Jon Snader

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]