groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] inconsistent synopsis for .MAILTO

From: Jon Snader
Subject: Re: [Groff] inconsistent synopsis for .MAILTO
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:58:47 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i 
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:09:12AM +0000, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> 
> As an aside, I'd vote against the < and > characters personally.  A S
> and E suffix as in PS/PE, TS/TE, etc., would be fine.  <> just look
> wrong in a troff macro name.
> 

Good idea.  I agree with this.

Jon Snader
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]