groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info


From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 23:18:44 +0100 (CET)

> > Usually, the DocBook file is used to create various output
> > formats, so it is not unlikely that someone produces troff output
> > from DocBook.  And that is perverse IMHO.
> 
> Why?  DocBook is a structural markup language for documentation; it
> does *not* specify the appearance of a document.  Troff is a
> typesetting language; it is all about specifying the appearance of a
> document.  Why would it be perverse to transform from structural
> markup into a typesetting language for output?

A misunderstanding.  Assume that you prepare a typographically good
looking document in groff.  Then you use a hypothetical grodocbook
output device to produce SGML.  Finally, a user converts DocBook back
to groff for printing.


    Werner

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]