Re: [Groff] little missing in 1.12 (just a different way to get the thingy)

[Fabrizio Polacco]

On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 09:46:13PM +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> >         <procname> ::= <name><version><revision>
> >             <name> ::= <text>
> >             <version> ::= <real>
> >             <revision> ::= <uint>
> > 
> >     `1.11a' is obviously not a real.
> 
> Thanks for reporting!  It has been fixed in the CVS, together with two
> other serious bugs...

As you probably can prefere a three numbers numbering scheme, I've made
a small change to permit use of the "revision" parameter above.

With this change, you can name next minor release groff-1.15.2, while
leaving 1.15 in the VERSION file, and putting 2 in the REVISION file (a
new one).

The groff with this patch produces:
$ man -Tps mandb | grep '1.15'
%%Creator: groff version 1.15
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: procset grops 1.15 1
%%BeginResource: procset grops 1.15 1

while the previous:
$ man -Tps mandb | grep '1.15'
%%Creator: groff version 1.15
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: procset grops 1.15 0
%%BeginResource: procset grops 1.15 0


fab
-- 
| address@hidden     address@hidden    address@hidden
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
| address@hidden                  gsm: +358 (0)40 707 2468

g15v
Description: Text document