groff-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[groff] 06/10: [ms]: Generalize advice regarding FL register.


From: G. Branden Robinson
Subject: [groff] 06/10: [ms]: Generalize advice regarding FL register.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:48:51 -0400 (EDT)

gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit 9b26bb90eb8bcd28dc02f18f407d9a2fcc1bf7fc
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Mar 14 21:56:26 2021 +1100

    [ms]: Generalize advice regarding FL register.
---
 doc/groff.texi | 4 ++--
 doc/ms.ms      | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/groff.texi b/doc/groff.texi
index 1b726fb..9bf570a 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi
+++ b/doc/groff.texi
@@ -2874,8 +2874,8 @@ Version 7 Unix @file{ms}, its descendants, and GNU 
@file{ms} prior to
 @code{groff} version 1.23.0} an @code{FL} register was used for the line
 length in footnotes; however, setting this register at document
 initialization time had no effect on the footnote line length in
-multi-column arrangements.@footnote{You could reset it after calling
-@code{.2C} or @code{.MC}, then again after @code{.1C}.}
+multi-column arrangements.@footnote{You could reset it after each call
+to @code{.1C}, @code{.2C}, or @code{.MC}.}
 
 @code{FR} should be used in preference to the old @code{FL} register in
 contemporary documents.  The footnote line length is effectively
diff --git a/doc/ms.ms b/doc/ms.ms
index 894cdd2..9061742 100644
--- a/doc/ms.ms
+++ b/doc/ms.ms
@@ -1772,12 +1772,11 @@ setting this register at document initialization time 
had no effect on
 the footnote line length in multi-column arrangements.\**
 .
 .FS
-You could reset it after calling
-.CW .2C
+You could reset it after each call to
+.CW .1C ,
+.CW .2C ,
 or
-.CW .MC ,
-then again after
-.CW .1C .
+.CW .MC .
 .FE
 .
 .



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]