[groff] 01/08: groff_mom(7): Fix excessively long unfilled lines.

[G. Branden Robinson]

gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit 5002932262b93e34c8fcdf1f358e8bb73abf6ac1
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Oct 11 01:57:51 2020 +1100

    groff_mom(7): Fix excessively long unfilled lines.
    
    Some examples had lines that were too long, overrunning 78n.
    
    Also stop spamming the reader with bold in examples of pure input (which
    was all of them).
    
    Make edits to example content, mainly to shorten the first example so it
    fits on both one (example) input line and the man page.
    
    Also use standard man(7) macros for font styling instead of the
    page-local .FONT macro.
---
 contrib/mom/groff_mom.7.man | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/mom/groff_mom.7.man b/contrib/mom/groff_mom.7.man
index 19c1311..6f93f46 100644
--- a/contrib/mom/groff_mom.7.man
+++ b/contrib/mom/groff_mom.7.man
@@ -990,9 +990,8 @@ above, means the numeric identifier of the tab.
 The following shows a sample input line with string tab markers.
 .RS
 .EX
-.FONT B \[rs]*[ST1] R "Now is the time" B \[rs]*[ST1X] R " for all " \
-B \[rs]*[ST2] R "good men" B \[rs]*ST2X] \
-R " to come to the aid of the party."
+.BR \[rs]*[ST1] "De minimus" \[rs]*[ST1X] \c
+.RB "non curat" \[rs]*[ST2] lex \[rs]*[ST2X] .
 .EE
 .RE
 .
@@ -1108,17 +1107,16 @@ Rather than this,
 you should do:
 .RS
 .EX
-.B .QUAD CENTER
-.B .PAD """#\[rs]*[ST1]A line of text\[rs]*[ST1X]#"""
-.B .EL
-.B .ST 1
-.B .TAB 1
-.B .PT_SIZE 24
-.B .ALD 3p
-.B \[rs]*[RULE] \[rs]" Note that you can't use \[rs]*[UP] or \
-\[rs]*[DOWN] with \[rs]*[RULE]\""
-.B .RLD 3p
-.B .TQ
+\&.QUAD CENTER
+\&.PAD "#\[rs]*[ST1]A line of text\[rs]*[ST1X]#"
+\&.EL
+\&.ST 1
+\&.TAB 1
+\&.PT_SIZE 24
+\&.ALD 3p
+\&\[rs]" You can't use \[rs]*[UP] or \[rs]*[DOWN] with \[rs]*[RULE].
+\&.RLD 3p
+\&.TQ
 .EE
 .RE
 .
@@ -1743,11 +1741,11 @@ Hanging indent \[em] the optional argument requires a 
unit of measure.
 A hanging indent looks like this:
 .RS
 .EX
-\fB  The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I
-    could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed
-    revenge.  You who so well know the nature of my soul
-    will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a
-    threat, at length I would be avenged.\|.\|.
+The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I
+  could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed
+  revenge.  You who so well know the nature of my soul
+  will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a
+  threat, at length I would be avenged.\|.\|.
 .EE
 .RE
 .
@@ -1841,30 +1839,30 @@ This recipe exists to demonstrate the use of
 only.
 .RS
 .EX
-.B ".PAGE 8.5i 11i 1i 1i 1i 1i"
-.B ".FAMILY  T"
-.B ".FT      R"
-.B ".PT_SIZE 12"
-.B ".LS      14"
-.B ".JUSTIFY"
-.B ".KERN"
-.B ".SS 0"
-.B ".IL \[rs]w'\[rs]0\[rs]0.'"
-.B ".HI \[rs]w'\[rs]0\[rs]0.'"
-\fB1.\[rs]0The most important point to be considered is whether the
-answer to the meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything
-really is 42.  We have no-one's word on the subject except
-Mr.\& Adams'.
-.B .HI
+\&.PAGE 8.5i 11i 1i 1i 1i 1i
+\&.FAMILY  T
+\&.FT      R
+\&.PT_SIZE 12
+\&.LS      14
+\&.JUSTIFY
+\&.KERN
+\&.SS 0
+\&.IL \[rs]w'\[rs]0\[rs]0.'
+\&.HI \[rs]w'\[rs]0\[rs]0.'
+1.\[rs]0The most important point to be considered is whether
+the answer to the meaning of Life, the Universe, and
+Everything really is 42.  We have no one\[aq]s word on the
+subject except Mr.\& Adams\[aq]s.
+\&.HI
 2.\[rs]0If the answer to the meaning of Life, the Universe,
 and Everything is indeed 42, what impact does this have on
 the politics of representation?  42 is, after all not a
-prime number.  Are we to infer that prime numbers don't
+prime number.  Are we to infer that prime numbers don\[aq]t
 deserve equal rights and equal access in the universe?
-.B .HI
-3.\[rs]0If 42 is deemed non-exclusionary, how do we present it
-as the answer and, at the same time, forestall debate on its
-exclusionary implications?
+\&.HI
+3.\[rs]0If 42 is deemed non-exclusionary, how do we present
+it as the answer and, at the same time, forestall debate
+on its exclusionary implications?
 .EE
 .RE
 .