[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ntrip and sending position
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: ntrip and sending position |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:22:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Which is why some GNSS receivers can use NTRIP from the netvia your
>> > phone. Or post process the data.
>>
>> exactly where I am going.
>
> Both NTRIP and PPP?
I find that WAAS isn't as good as local DGPS from the USCG used to be,
even with a clear sky view. But I have no hard data.
I am headed to corrections over the internet to get more accurate
real-time positions via navigation solutions, so I can map in the field,
and also later. I would be very happy with 2m accuracy.
I have the impression PPP requires static observations for a longish
time, vs being able to produce a gpx of a moving receiver.
I would like to get RTK working, but my impression is that one needs
unobstructed views and good signals, unless you get recent high-end
equipment.
- Re: ntrip and sending position, (continued)
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/17
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/17
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/17
- ubxtool and python 3, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/17
- Re: ubxtool and python 3, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/17
- Re: ubxtool and python 3, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/18
- Re: ubxtool and python 3, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/18
- Re: ubxtool and python 3, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/19
- Re: ubxtool and python 3, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/20
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/17
- Re: ntrip and sending position,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/18
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/18
- Re: ntrip and sending position, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/18