[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using
From: |
Anthony Stirk |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Sep 2013 13:26:35 +0100 |
No problems ill get you the info when I can use a computer properly again.
Cheers
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Sep 2013, at 12:19, "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Anthony Stirk <address@hidden>:
>> Messy is better than the current method which doesn't work :) How can we
>> move this forward and get it implemented ?
>
> I'm *not* going to implement it as a substitute for figuring out what's
> wrong with the -x method; that way lies danger. Papering over known bugs by
> adding elaborate new features isn't going to happen.
>
> You can move this forward by doing a test with the -x and -e options
> and a hex dumper to pin down what gpsctl is actually emitting, then
> figuring out what it ought to be emitting, then telling us what
> the difference is.
>
> Later, some sort of capability feature such as Gary describes may be
> added to save people the labor of composing the -x strings in common
> cases.
> --
> <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Gary E. Miller, 2013/09/03
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/09/03
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Anthony Stirk, 2013/09/03
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Gary E. Miller, 2013/09/03
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Anthony Stirk, 2013/09/03
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/09/13
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Anthony Stirk, 2013/09/14
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/09/14
- Re: [gpsd-users] Binary protocol using,
Anthony Stirk <=