gnustep-webmasters
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wiki.gnustep.org template Revisited


From: Manuel Guesdon
Subject: Re: wiki.gnustep.org template Revisited
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:05:39 +0200 (CEST)

Hi,

On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:27:45 -0700 Alex Perez <address@hidden> wrote:
 >| On April 6 of this year, you replied to an e-mail I'd sent to the 
 >| GNUstep webmasters mailing list regarding a request by me to have 
 >| administrative access to the GNUstep wiki in order to re-work the 
 >| template to more closely match the new GNUstep.org website layout (sans 
 >| the navigation bar).
 >| 
 >| At that time, you said "If everyone is ok here, I can give you 
 >| administrator access and ftp access to the wiki." and I never followed 
 >| up, but nobody ever said they had a problem with it in the month and a 
 >| half since then.
 >| 
 >| So, may I have access, pretty please?

Yes. Sent privately.
BTW, for histing technical question, troubles,... it's better to write to 
        support+manuel [at] oxymium.net
as I don't check webmasterlist too often.


 >| TOPIC 2: On another note, I'm on summer vacation from uni and have plans 
 >| to work extensively on the GNUstep website. Two things that I intend to 
 >| work on are the lack of both a GDL2 and GNUstepWeb page. The 
 >| GNUstepweb.org site hasn't been updated since October of 2003 (Manuel, I 
 >| think this is your arena) but I was thinking maybe we could put the 
 >| responsibility of updating it on someone else, mainly me. 

I've sent you an account on SPIP system by email.
If someone else want to write something, he's welcome.
If someone can send me gnustep.org definitive stylesheets and guidelines, 
I'll adapt gnustepweb.org to the new look.



 >| We also need 
 >| better documentation for GSWeb. 

Yes. I've started some (out of date) things at 
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/GNUstepWeb
The idea was to start some documents and after to group them as a real doc


 >| Additionally, we need to have some sort 
 >| of GDL2 page, even if it's humble. Ratmice (Matt Rice) has volunteered 
 >| to write some more GDL2 documentation, and we can link to the Apple EOF 
 >| stuff as well for the time being, since something is better than nothing.

I don't know if it a good idea for to link to EOF documentation. Any opinions ?

Manuel






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]