[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org
From: |
Wim Oudshoorn |
Subject: |
Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:34:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
MJ Ray <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2004-03-09 08:14:05 +0000 Wim Oudshoorn <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>>> (2) I think link "Frameworks" under the "Resources" heading is
>>>> unfortunately named. It points to a section in the
>> Think about Frameworks as libraries. If I see a link "Libraries" I
>> expect a list of libraries, not only documentation.
>
> So, is the problem that the link should be under "Information" or
> "Documentation" rather than "Resources"?
Yes, if it would appear under "Documentation" I would expect
documentation and that is what it is.
Although I am still not sure if Frameworks is the right
title. But I you ask what would be better I can't tell.
>> No, that is not what I mean :-). When I am browsing a site
>> I do not like it when I am /unexpectedly/ end up at another site.
>
> Yes, the wording of that link is poor and should be fixed. I'm not
> keen on adding a specific external link marker. This is the web, so
> external links are very necessary.
I agree, an explicit marker is not good. But if the wording
makes it clear it is external I am happy. It is the unexpectedness
that I dislike.
>> Also, I do think it would be nicer if the "News" section of the .us
>> site is part of the Overview section of the main gnustep.org site.
>
> I can only think of using an iframe pointing at wwwmain.gnustep.org to
> do that. I think gnustep.us tends to carry more application news that
> might not be vital to have on .org's front page.
Well, embedding is not what I had in mind. But if the distinction
is clear between "Application News" and "GNUstep" news I have
no problem at all with the external site.
But still I feel somehow better if the application news would be
carried by the gnustep.org site itself.
Well, let me close by saying that we end up in a detailed
discussion, which is good. But I am not maintaining the
site. So your opinion is more important the mine :-)
Wim Oudshoorn.
- Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Wim Oudshoorn, 2004/03/08
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Alex Perez, 2004/03/10
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/10
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Wim Oudshoorn, 2004/03/10
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/10
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org,
Wim Oudshoorn <=
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/19
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/19
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Wim Oudshoorn, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/25
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Alex Perez, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Wim Oudshoorn, 2004/03/20
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/23