Re: Comments on revised website design

[MJ Ray]

On 2004-01-12 04:24:23 +0000 Scott Stevenson <address@hidden> wrote:

> I agree. The original template didn't look like this. I think the 
> problem 
> arose when the font units were changed from pixels to points, but the 
> margins 
> (in pixels) were not changed to compensate. End result: less white 
> space.

The original template didn't look like that because the original 
template didn't have large blocks of solid text. It reformatted the 
text. I've upped the padding anyway, as that looks better to me.

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ address@hidden
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/