[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forking on Github and feedback
From: |
陈北宗 |
Subject: |
Re: Forking on Github and feedback |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:49:28 +0800 |
David:
I have noticed that being one of the two build modes since I actually went in
and dissected the code, but the point I am trying to make here is that the
independent mode will be the only mode available, and no vestige of
gnustep-make-dependent mode remain. I am already tackling the removal of GC
down to every source file and the corresponding header and source files are
already deleted. CoreBase still depend on gnustep-make though (but I don’t
really mind as it will end up being part of a rewrite)
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 22:09, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec 2015, at 13:51, 陈北宗 <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> This is the reason I am proposing moving libobjc2 and CoreBase to pure Cmake
>
> Please actually look at things before you propose modifying them. libobjc2
> uses pure CMake and has no dependencies on any other part of GNUstep,
> precisely to avoid a bootstrapping problem.
>
> You can see the list of build dependencies in the FreeBSD port:
>
> http://www.freshports.org/lang/libobjc2/
>
> It depends on cmake and nothing else that is not part of the base system (it
> depends on clang from packages on older FreeBSD releases where gcc was the
> system compiler).
>
> David
>
- Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/04
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/04
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/05
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/05
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/08
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/09
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/09
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback, David Chisnall, 2015/12/09
- Re: Forking on Github and feedback,
陈北宗 <=
Re: Forking on Github and feedback, 陈北宗, 2015/12/04